Search for: "Mr. Harold J. Martin" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Sims v Jooste (No.2) [2014] WASC 373, Kenneth Martin J dismissed an action for libel based on publication on a website known as HotCopper. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
A high-profile week at the Leveson Inquiry, with evidence from Rebekah Brooks, the MailOnline editor Martin Clarke and Andy Coulson (see Natalie Peck’s Inforrm roundup). [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The committee has published further uncorrected transcripts: 22 November 2011 (PDF): Mr Phil Hall, former Editor, News of the World Mr Andrew Gilligan, London Editor, Daily Telegraph and Sunday Telegraph Sir Harold Evans, Editor-at-Large, Thomson Reuters, and Mr Stephen J Adler, Editor-in-Chief, Thomson Reuters. 15 November 2011 (PDF): Mr Tony Close, Head of Standards, Ofcom, and Mr David Mahoney, Head of Content Policy, Ofcom Ms… [read post]
26 May 2015, 4:00 am by Adam Dodek
Best book on Constitutional Law: Peter J. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
’  We had posts about this by Steve Barnett and Martin Moore. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Martin County, 491 So. 2d 1109 (1986) (noting that "[t]he courts have authority to do things that are essential to the performance of their judicial functions. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Nussbaum (1) Bernard-Henry Lévy (3) Bert Parks (1) Bertrand Russell (1) Bessie Smith (1) Best of the Web (7) bestiality (14) Beta Rube (1) betamax3000 (18) Beth (the commenter) (9) Bette Davis (14) Bette Midler (1) Betty Friedan (8) Betty White (1) Beyonce (18) Bhutan (2) Bianca Jagger (1) Bible (40) Biddy Martin (13) biden (177) Biden gaffes (21) Biff (1) big and small (5) Big Government sounds like a creepy stalker (10) Big Hollywood (1) Big Mike (1) bigotry (22) biking (160)… [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:00 am by Brooke MacKenzie
The Supreme Court of Canada summarized the applicable principle (from the 1990 decision in MacDonald Estate v Martin) in its 2013 decision in CN Railway v McKercher as follows: A lawyer cannot act in a matter where he may use confidential information obtained from a former or current client to the detriment of that client. [read post]